Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emeralowe, Wisconsin
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Snow delete Mandsford 23:54, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Emeralowe, Wisconsin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is either a hoax or original research, as there are no sources whatsoever verifying the existence of this community. It's not listed in the GNIS, it's not included in WisDOT's map of Washington County, it's not in the Dictionary of Wisconsin History, and a Google search of the topic turns up nothing but Wikipedia mirrors. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 00:04, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Search for Emeralowe on Yahoo--one hit, Wikipedia. Blueboy96 00:14, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wisconsin-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I'm not coming up with anything relating to a geographical area on any search. As this is Wisconsin, I don't think there's a language/spelling issue. --Oakshade (talk) 01:10, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as unverifiable. Possibly a local name for the place or WP:MADEUP. A Google search only gets Wikipedia and mirrors. • Gene93k (talk) 01:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I thought about nominating it myself and I did research around 14 hours ago. I found only 2 hits on the world "Emeralowe" using google and nothing on detailed Wisconsin maps to attempt to figure out the exact spot within a mile (kilometer). It appears to be made up. Royalbroil 02:16, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I also check the Wisconsin Dictionary of History and the DeLorme Atlas and there was no information. Thank you-RFD (talk) 13:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per above, hoax CTJF83 21:33, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.