Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arcadiy Golubovich

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Vanamonde (talk) 23:50, 25 September 2018 (UTC)

Arcadiy Golubovich

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Arcadiy Golubovich (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Can find nothing beyond mentions-in-passing either online or in the refs in the article itself. Seems to have been one of team of many producers on a number of films. Fails WP:GNG. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 23:42, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 23:50, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 23:50, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Russia-related deletion discussions. GameInfirmary Talk 23:50, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:06, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KCVelaga (talk) 00:14, 11 September 2018 (UTC)

• Delete Can't discover significant coverage for the subject. Some sources mentions him but they are passing mentions. Lorstaking (talk) 11:36, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
• Keep. The refs in the article are more than sufficient. Szzuk (talk) 13:12, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

• Szzuk, if that is the case, could you please advise which two cited sources would count most towards WP:GNG? Edwardx (talk) 14:27, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still no consensus here, may require closing as no consensus if this relist doesn't do the trick.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kirbanzo (talk) 18:19, 18 September 2018 (UTC)

• Weak Keep This article needs some structural work but given the amount of work he's done in film productions, I think he may pass WP:GNG. Unless each source can be analyzed heavily and proven to me that they aren't sufficient for GNG, my vote will remain as is. I checked and double checked, and about half of the sources count towards GNG while the others are just more local/possibly paid publications (overall, sourcing is legitimate). Redditaddict69 ^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:53, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.